Free books

for frustrated writers,
for adventurous readers.

This site hosts original text works – nonfiction, fiction or poetry of any length, published or unpublished – submitted free by the author. The author gives up no copyright or any other right to his or her work. This site and the author agree that no work may be reused commercially, that no modification of the work is allowed except for style formatting and that any noncommercial reuse give credit to the author.

To upload...

Submit text works in one of three categories – nonfiction, fiction or poetry – to sidleavitt@yahoo.com. Simple text is preferred. Any images or graphics within it cannot be reproduced. For details on author certification and permission, click on the 'Contact details' link.

To comment...

Readers are free to download any listing from the 'Works' section in the righthand column, subject to the aforementioned restrictions, and to provide comments to the site administrator at sidleavitt@yahoo.com for publication in the 'Comments on works' listing. To comment on any excerpt or other post shown in the center column, simply do so directly beneath the post by clicking on the '(No) Comments' link. Unless otherwise specified, all comments will be published, subject to libel guidelines.

About us...

Readersandwritersblog.com is a nonprofit website intended to give writers a place to publish their work at no cost and readers a chance to read that work and, if they choose, to comment on it. We also seek out well-written sites and post them on our blogroll. The site's founder and unpaid administrator is its first nonfiction contributor, Sid Leavitt, a retired newspaper editor who lives in Lake Katrine, N.Y.

Blogging schedule

We try to post new blog entries every three and a half days – at 12:01 p.m. Sunday and 12:01 a.m. Thursday.

Meta

Who’s listening?

February 10, 2008

recorder

I was reading an article about ‘legacies’ — you know, affirmative action for rich white kids who get into elite colleges because of their family’s influence — and it caught my attention because I also happen to read for an elite college.

No, not read in the British sense of studying a subject at university, but read as in tape-recording textbooks for students with disabilities.

Now, the idea of legacies irritates me — in fact, it pisses me off for several reasons I will discuss later — but I’m not prepared to say that the students I read for, even though they may come from rich alumni families, are particularly advantaged.

One of the books I recorded a while back was an astronomy text. Besides reading the words in the text, I also had to describe the charts, photographs and illustrations, and the book was full of them. Imagine trying to describe an illustration showing the relative sizes of planets, stars, galaxies and various nebulae — or how magnetic fields and stellar winds interact.

It wasn’t easy, especially when I wondered how the student was going to understand any of this.

Because she was blind. From birth, I think.

Jesus.

The college, which is very well known, will remain unnamed. I don’t live in the same town — the texts and recordings are exchanged by mail — and there are a lot of elite colleges here in the Northeast.

I went to one of those Ivy League-type schools, but I was no legacy. My parents were white but poor, and my legacy from them was that I knew how to work, which I did, serving meals every day to fellow students who didn’t have to work. And I studied. I had to. Unlike most of my classmates who were prepared in academia at places like Andover and Exeter, I came from a public school where most graduates didn’t go on to college.

I was lucky to go to that college, and I never forgot it. But I wondered how many of my advantaged classmates realized how lucky they were to be born into the right families. Well, at least none of them wandered off to Texas, became a fundamentalist and then decided to make war on all the fundamentalists who didn’t agree with him. (So now you know I didn’t go to Yale.)

What got me thinking about legacies was an article on the website Diverse that said more advantaged white kids get special treatment in admissions to elite schools than the combined number of blacks and other racial and ethnic groups who are admitted under affirmative action.

I came across a similar article on the website Outside the Beltway in which a commenter said some well-off families arrange for even more advantages for their children by getting them declared ‘learning disabled.’ That gets them extra time on exams and extra help like the recordings I provide.

My recording work, which started about 10 years ago, is sporadic. When I started, I was otherwise gainfully employed and did the reading for free. Now that I’m retired and on a tight budget, I take the small hourly fee the college offers.

Like I said, it’s off and on, and I never meet the students. In some cases, I’m told what the disability is so I can adjust my reading. For example, if the disability is dyslexia, the student follows the text while listening to the tape. In those cases, I read faster than usual because sight reading is faster than oral reading. In other cases, other visual or learning disabilities are involved.

In fact, some of these students may be legacy kids who are faking their disabilities. In most cases, however, considering the quality of the college, I doubt it. But maybe I’m being naive.

My current assignment is reading a textbook on statistics — you know, the mean, median, histograms, deviations and all that stuff. I’ve been told to read the charts, graphs and formulas with their Greek letters and mathematical symbols, although I haven’t been told what the student’s disability is.

I can’t think about it being a legacy kid faking a disability. Because what if it’s another blind girl?

– Sid Leavitt

Posted in Uncategorized |

5 Responses

  1. Karen says:

    Sid,

    Another great blog post! I love visiting your site and getting an inside look into your life, past and present.

  2. Sid Leavitt says:

    Thank you, Karen. And while my life at present is a bit quieter due to retirement, I have a helluva lot of past. And it’s growing bigger. So I doubt I’ll run out of things to write about.

    By the way, I hope you never run out of things to write about — actually, I doubt very much that you will, what with your being intelligent, articulate and all — because I always enjoy your weblog, McQuestionable Musings.

  3. P.L. Frederick says:

    We can all use help from caring individuals. Anyone who fakes needing help — well, that’s a symptom that they need help. You put the effort out there and, like a seed, it grows where it will. Who can say what’ll sprout? Or where or when?

    You help make the world a more pleasant place. I know that some of that niceness rubs off on me, just by reading this blog. And what a writer you are! (And if you’re explaining graphs and charts — what a speaker!)

  4. P.L. Frederick says:

    P.S. “Well, at least none of them wandered off to Texas, became a fundamentalist and then decided to make war on all the fundamentalists who didn’t agree with him.” — This succinctly put it all into place for me. Thanks!

  5. Sid Leavitt says:

    P.L., you’re the best (and not just because you send me compliments, although, I must admit, they do tend to make me conclude that you are one fine judge of writing).

    Seriously, let me return one of your compliments. Because your weblog, Small & Big, makes my world — and, I’m sure, the worlds of your other readers — a pleasant place, too.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.